Junocal vs Arketa

Side by side

Fourteen rows of structural facts. Every Junocal value applies to every plan tier; every Arketa value is the most-comparable published equivalent.

Where Junocal is better

Five specific things, each with a number or a documented behaviour behind it.

• Reformer pick-a-spot, built in and deep

  Junocal builds pick-a-spot floor plan booking in: drag-and-drop reformer placement, named-position booking, automatic rerouting when a spot goes out of action, per-class layout toggle. For reformer pilates studios where pick-a-spot is the core booking experience, this is a hard requirement. Arketa's video-first product DNA means pick-a-spot isn't a core part of the platform — basic capacity scheduling is supported, but the floor-plan-plus-spot-booking pattern that reformer studios depend on isn't in the product at the depth Junocal, Mariana Tek, or Walla ship.

• Term-based courses built in

  Junocal builds term-based courses in (8-week beginner blocks, 200-hour teacher trainings, fixed cohorts paid once up-front, makeup credits, swap rules, four-mode refund policy). When you publish a course, Junocal creates all the sessions for you, and each student gets one booking that tracks every session in the term. Arketa supports cohort-style classes through its scheduling tools but doesn't build term-based courses in as a dedicated feature — the setup is closer to a recurring class series than to the UK pilates term-based block. For UK pilates and yoga studios where term-based courses are meaningful revenue, the gap is real.

• In-person depth: spots, waitlists, subs, intake

  Junocal goes deep on in-person classes: pick-a-spot, a day-of staff view that flags intake alerts, two waitlist modes (the next person booked automatically, plus first-to-claim), a substitute pool that notifies cover automatically, conditional intake that captures injuries by body part, intake forms per service, and four-mode cancellation policies. Arketa supports these at the level its target customer needs (online-first yoga teachers don't depend on most of them), but the depth gap shows up for brick-and-mortar studios where these are the daily tools. For studios where the in-person operation is the core, Junocal goes meaningfully deeper here.

• Stripe Connect Standard with full account ownership

  Junocal uses Stripe Connect Standard where the studio is the merchant of record with its own Stripe account, paying Stripe's published rates directly with no platform fee. Arketa runs payments on Stripe but adds a flat 3% transaction fee on top of Stripe's own rate on its Individual plans, pushing the effective rate toward 6% all-in. For online-first yoga teachers where payment volume is modest, the fee may be tolerable. For brick-and-mortar studios doing higher card volume, the difference is significant: on $100,000 of volume, Arketa's 3% is about $3,000 a year that Junocal studios don't pay — and Junocal's direct, account-level Stripe relationship also helps with dispute escalation and payout customisation.

• Mature operator ecosystem and case-study patterns

  Junocal documents the full switching path from each major incumbent: pricing differences, field mapping, dry-run review, cutover timing, and the day-to-day workflows studios need to verify. That studio-specific migration system reduces uncertainty before an operator commits and is backed by hands-on migration support in the first 30 days.

Total cost of ownership

Arketa's official pricing page lists one Individual plan at $49/month billed annually, with a 3% transaction fee plus Stripe fees. Studio Core, Studio Growth and Studio Suite are custom-quoted. The public page states that plans renew month to month unless the customer chooses annual billing. Reproducible example: $49 × 12 = $588 annual subscription; on $100,000 of processed volume, 3% × $100,000 = $3,000, for $3,588/year before Stripe. Junocal Studio is $29 × 12 = $348/year before the same underlying Stripe processing and adds no percentage platform fee. The calculation therefore compares $3,588 above Stripe with $348 above Stripe at that volume.

Migrating from Arketa

Arketa-to-Junocal migrations are uncommon because the two platforms serve materially different customer shapes — most Arketa customers are online-first and either stay on Arketa or migrate to OfferingTree / Momence for similar feature shape. The migrations we do see are brick-and-mortar studios that started on Arketa thinking the online-first model would fit and discovered after some operating time that the in-person operational depth wasn't there. The standard migration flow applies: CSV exports from Arketa (client list, bookings, memberships, intake submissions). Junocal handles the field mapping. Dry-run in staging. Sunday cutover. Typical timeline: 5 business days. The complication is on-demand video library handling — if your studio has built up a meaningful video library that Arketa hosts itself, the underlying video files may not export cleanly. Studios moving from Arketa with a meaningful video library typically re-upload to Vimeo (around $7/month for unlimited videos) during the transition and link from the Junocal booking page. The re-upload work depends on library size and can extend the migration timeline by 1-3 days. Free in the first 30 days for Arketa migrations.

How Junocal compares to the others

Looking at more than one tool is the right move. The other head-to-heads: